<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bing: March Equinox Explain in Arabic</title><link>http://www.bing.com:80/search?q=March+Equinox+Explain+in+Arabic</link><description>Search results</description><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Microsoft. All rights reserved. These XML results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner or for any purpose other than rendering Bing results within an RSS aggregator for your personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of these results requires express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. By accessing this web page or using these results in any manner whatsoever, you agree to be bound by the foregoing restrictions.</copyright><item><title>Why is -march=native not enabled by default by compilers/IDEs?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52653025/why-is-march-native-not-enabled-by-default-by-compilers-ides</link><description>For -O0, whether -march=native or -march=&lt;generic&gt; is the default still specifies the same family, so both are perfectly compatibly with -O0; and whenever another optimization level is specified, -march=native is beneficial to performance. So, for me, the fact that -O0 is the default doesn't matter for -march 's default.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 01:33:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>gcc: Differences between -march=native and -march=&lt;specific arch&gt;</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63922720/gcc-differences-between-march-native-and-march-specific-arch</link><description>How does -march=native choose which instruction sets to enable and which to disable? I have the following conjecture: -march=native will be using CPUID instructions to calculate supported instruction sets etc in order to detect the processor variant -march=foobar will use a hardcoded list of instruction sets which processor foobar supports.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 02:18:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>c++ - equivalent of -march=native for msvc - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77765315/equivalent-of-march-native-for-msvc</link><description>As far as I know, the compilation option for MSVC that tells the compiler to use special available instruction is /arch. On clang/linux, we can use -march=native to automatically detect the archite...</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:41:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>-march=haswell vs -march=core-avx2 vs -mavx2 - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73142229/march-haswell-vs-march-core-avx2-vs-mavx2</link><description>What are the differences and tradeoffs between -march=haswell, -march=core-avx2, and -mavx2 for compiling avx2 intrinsics? I know that -mavx2 is a flag and -march=haswell/core-avx2 are architectures which just translate to a bunch of flags. So -mavx2 is a subset of the other two. But beyond that, how do I choose the right one for my application?</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:08:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cannot find suitable multilib set for '-march=rv32imafd_zicntr_zicsr ...</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79626441/cannot-find-suitable-multilib-set-for-march-rv32imafd-zicntr-zicsr-zifencei</link><description>When I configured and make the GCC by " sudo ../configure --prefix=/opt/riscv --target=riscv32-unknown-elf --disable-multilib --with-multilib-generator="rv32gc_zicntr ...</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 02:28:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>unrecognized command-line option '-arch'; did you mean '-march='?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68145157/unrecognized-command-line-option-arch-did-you-mean-march</link><description>unrecognized command-line option '-arch'; did you mean '-march='? Asked 4 years, 10 months ago Modified 1 year, 11 months ago Viewed 3k times</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 13:29:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to see which flags -march=native will activate?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5470257/how-to-see-which-flags-march-native-will-activate</link><description>Instead of manually selecting the optimization flags I'm using -march=native, which in theory should add all optimization flags applicable to the hardware I'm compiling on.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:50:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to know all supported values for clang -march argument?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79500994/how-to-know-all-supported-values-for-clang-march-argument</link><description>Using Clang 16.0 or later, I would like to know what values could be used for the -march argument. The command clang --print-supported-cpus shows for -mcpu=, but I see no alternative for -march.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 12:11:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>gcc - How is -march different from -mtune? - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10559275/how-is-march-different-from-mtune</link><description>-march=foo implies -mtune=foo unless you also specify a different -mtune. This is one reason why using -march is better than just enabling options like -mavx without doing anything about tuning. Caveat: -march=native on a CPU that GCC doesn't specifically recognize will still enable new instruction sets that GCC can detect, but will leave -mtune=generic. Use a new enough GCC that knows about ...</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:05:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>riscv cross compiler error: invalid -march= option: `rv64imafdc_zicsr'</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79022970/riscv-cross-compiler-error-invalid-march-option-rv64imafdc-zicsr</link><description>riscv cross compiler error: invalid -march= option: `rv64imafdc_zicsr' Asked 1 year, 7 months ago Modified 1 year, 5 months ago Viewed 344 times</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:13:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>